PURPOSE OF THE REJOINDER SECTION

We invite readers to respond to any of the articles that appear in this journal. Because conversation takes place over time and builds on itself, this feature of our journal will be ongoing and readers are encouraged to submit responses to articles appearing in the current issue as well as any past issue. The Rejoinder Section will continue to put up new responses as long as the conversation continues on a topic. Please note that these responses are intended to be carefully thought-out analyses on some point made by the authors. Unlike a discussion forum, these papers will also undergo a refereed process.

Volume 1, Number 1, Winter 2006: Liberty and Equality: Conflicting Values in the Public Schools of a Liberal Democratic Society

The Purpose and Power of the First Amendment: A Response to Hildon and Colitti
Daniel Larner
Western Washington University

About the Authors – Volume 1 Number 1

Volume 2, Number 1, Winter 2007: Jonathan Kozol's Nation of Shame Forty Years Later

Toward a Critical Race Pedagogy of Hope: A Rejoinder to Brian Schultz
By Sherick A. Hughes
The University of Maryland

OPPOSING ANALYSES OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION OF JUNE 28, 2007 ON THE PICS v. SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT DECISION 

Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. l: Racial Imbalance is not Segregation
Sonya D. Jones and Erin N. Ramsey
Pacific Legal Foundation 

Eviscerating the Legacy of Brown in PICS v. Seattle
Brett Rubio
American Civil Liberties Union

U.S. Supreme Court Decision
 - Dec. 4, 2006 - Oral Arguments
 - June 28, 2007 - U.S. Supreme Court Decision

About the Authors – Volume 2 Number 1  

Volume 3 Number 1 Winter 2008: Schooling as if Democracy Matters

About the Authors – Volume 3 Number 1