Skip to main content
Woodring College of Education Woodring College of Education (Miller Hall) Western Washington UniversityMore options
   
StudentsMore options | Faculty/StaffMore options | Index | Home
About Us
What's New
Our Name and Mission
Upcoming Events
Holocaust Education Resources
Resources Available for Check-Out
Primary Source Documents: Der Stürmer
Readability Analysis
K-12 Student Projects
Kristallnacht Remembered
NWCHGEE Journal and Book Overviews
Genocide and Ethnocide
Building Community
Honoring Survivors
In Remembrance
A Lesson of Remembrance
NEH Grant
Noémi Ban Lecture Schedule

Washington State Holocaust Education Resource Center
Vancouver Holocaust Education Centre

NWCHGEE Home

Woodring Home
WWU Home
Northwest Center for Holocaust, Genocide and Ethnocide Education
Preparing thoughtful, knowledgeable, and effective educators for a diverse society.
NEH Grant Evaluation

Data Collection Instruments
Three data collection instruments were utilized.

1) Self- Efficacy Expectations Survey:  A survey designed by Tellyohann et al. (1996) was modified to measure participant self-reported expectations for teaching efficacy in the areas of the goals and objectives delineated in our proposal.  Teljohann’s instrument of measurement demonstrated acceptable construct validity and reliability in its measurement of the effects of in-service workshops on the self-efficacy of teaching health by teacher-participants.  Like Telyohann’s instrument, our 15 survey items were given a five-point Likert-type format, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree, with a 5 representing the highest score of self-efficacy.  One question was reverse-scored for analysis purposes.

2) Content Mastery Essay Questions:  This instrument required respondents to respond to a series of 13 essay questions that required cognitive knowledge of key figures, concepts, events, and theories in Holocaust/genocide studies; ideas and procedures to integrate Holocaust/genocide studies into the curricula; and elucidate upon their perception of the importance of Holocaust/genocide studies to their own educational and personal lives as well as to the lives of their students.

3) Reflective Assessment:  This tool asked participants to review the purpose of a Humanities Focus Grant, as described on page 5 of the NEH application packet, review the goals and objectives of our Holocaust/Genocide Studies Workshops, described in the proposal, and then provide direct feedback to NEH personnel on the success of the seminar.
 
            Data from the first two data collection instruments were analyzed quantitatively.  Data from the second collection instrument  was also analyzed qualitatively.  Data from the third collection measure will not be published.  However, further information can be requested by contacting the Director of the Northwest Center for Holocaust Education, Ray Wolpow.
            First, we will describe the procedures and results from the quantitative analysis of the first two data collection instruments.  Then we will describe the procedures and results from the qualitative analysis of the second instrument.

Collection of Data (Measures)
   
         The Self- Efficacy Expectations Survey and the Content Mastery Essay Questions were administered to both the participant and contrast groups at the end of the seminar.  Only the workshop participants completed the Reflective Assessment.  Participants from both groups were allowed to complete the tasks either in class or at home and were given the option of using personally compiled notes from Holocaust or Genocide seminars as well as books or articles that were marked during their participation in a Holocaust or genocide related workshop. The participants were instructed not to use any materials from which they had to read for the first time.  After completion of the requested assessment measures participants mailed, emailed, faxed, or hand-delivered their responses. 


Table of Contents

Introduction

Participants and Contrast Group

Data Collection Instruments

Collection of Data (Measures)

Quantitative Analysis

    Description of Analysis Procedures (Method)

    Results

    Discussion of Quantitative Results

Qualitative Analysis

    Research Question, Open Coding Axial Coding and Generation of Assertions Methods

    Four Assertions
        The Key Issues
        Concepts and Corresponding Methods
        Sources Identified by participants for Successful Holocaust
   
     Genocide Instruction

Continuation of Project 

References                                            
Appendix A:  Grant Documents

    Abstract 

    Goals and Objectives, Central Issues

    Work Plan Chart

    Project Staff and Participants

Appendix B:  Copies of Evaluation Instruments

    Self- Efficacy Expectations Survey

    Content Mastery Essay Questions

    Scoring Rubric for Content Mastery Essay Questions

    Instruction Sheet for Reflective Assessment Questions

 

 

 

 

Western Washington University Logo
© 2008 Woodring College of Education WWU
Western Washington University